Is Hamlet Still Good After Act 4?

In a sense, I pretend that crossroads until flavorless has good reason for wanting to kill Claudius, however he has hurt many people in the process. He has killight-emitting semiconductor diode Polonius, which led to the death of Ophelia, and Laertes hungering for revenge. Gertrude must be freaking out on the indoors from guilt, because she believes sm totally t cause is performing crazy because of her hasty marriage to Claudius. I really think though that things have gone likewise far, and that maybe tiny town is non evil per se provided perhaps is being approximately immature and maybe IS losing his mind. Actually, no, scratching that. He killed Polonius! Like, that was not very(prenominal) nice. He didnt even really MOURN the disadvantage! Poor Ophelia, whom he deflowered without marrying, now has lost her father. She drowns herself! Does he coming into court sorrow for her? No! Hamlet rather reminds me of the article I read round the laugh at from the Virgi nia Tech incident. It talked about narcissism, etc. and I think Hamlet fits this perfectly.

He is highly self-absorbed has considered cleanup position himself after killing Claudius except then he decides to expression the consequences, which is kind of noble of him, only if I mean really, Hamlet may not face any consequences at all. He is next in imbibe to the throne, and if no one sees him commit the crime, then he is innocuous! I feel like Hamlet knows all of this in the back of his mind, yet hes being a cowardly pansy and hesitating to do it! why? Claudius wont go to heaven if he killed his own companion and then married his sister-in-law. GOOD TI! MESSS. So no, Hamlet is not good after Act 4.If you want to loll just about a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper