Mass Strikes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Mass Strikes - Essay ExampleIn this paper, the writer addresses several issues relating to Workmates 2011. It discusses how and why the mid-nineties uppercase of the United Kingdom tube workers organized themselves against threatened privatization, and increasing precarity. It further discusses why the workers preferred using outside contractors at the expense couplings. As part of this paper, the reasons for the emergence ineffectiveness of the workers unions, the reasons of organizing outside them, and the cutting strategies the organizations have developed to address decrease in union power are also discussed in the paper. Introduction The lessen power of track maintenance workers union of London in 1990s, threatened it being outsourced to a private contractor under Public-Private Partnership (PPP) scheme (Ellman, 2010 p7). This saucily strategy was introduced to cut production cost, by introducing competitive tendering by private contractors to perform the work, which was e arlier done by the firms themselves. In addition, it was focused to replace copulation job security with insecure and temporary employment that was widespread under flexible labor market, and undercut terms and conditions of London Underground provide (Gall, 2003 p79). The 1990s London Underground workers were organized under Rail, Maritime and Transport Union (RMT). Casual staff and third-party contractors were, however, typically not unionized. Private contractors such as RMT, anarchist, and Andy began to use anarcho-syndicalist tactics like on-the-job direct and mass meeting actions to counteract divisions between non-union and union workers, and build resistance to the increasing outsourcing and privatization on the London Underground (McIlroy, 1995 p97). This tactic was mainly focused to divide and rule workforce. Divide and rule of the workforce led to the formation of Workmates collective in late 1998 and primaeval 1999. The first Workplace group was established in London maintenance depot. Policies of the Workplace group allowed all workers to join this group no matter of their union membership. It also set to organize meetings on shop floors, with the workers themselves as the members (Solidarity Federation, 2011 p4). The workmate collective took effect with a delegate council structure, which was set to function for 18 months. Within a period of 18 months, which ran up to mid-2000, members of the workmate collective organized several mass strikes, of which several ones were successful, and this created staff turnover. However, shop meetings were continued, and any worker was allowed to join this group notwithstanding of her or his union organization (Solidarity Federation, 2011 p4). Threatened Privatization London Underground drafted and introduced its Company Plan in the early 1990s. This plan was intended to bring a play of changes such as changing industrial relations structures, getting rid of some established perks, and reviewing workers te rms and conditions (Eur, 2002 p608). Additionally, the plan brought recruitment of new workers into stop, since new staff requirements were brought in as outsourced contractors. The new policies were focused on incorporating private sector norms into the firm, so that they would become more attractive to private capital (Eur, 2002 p610). Workers union such as RMT strongly opposed the new Company plan, but they