Abigail’s Party Essay

My group and I are adding on a put-on called the natal day society By Harold Pinter. The work is particularize in 1960s. The shooting we doing is about a opus, names Petey returning business firm from some sort of morning to job to a boarding base where his wife, whos called gazillion and is the owner, fusses most him. We start to see that this routine is real basic and a sense of this what they do e truly(prenominal) day. As the scene goes on Stanley comes in and endures quite a grumpy teenager. I play the part of Petey. At the metre of this plays setting, men had more(prenominal) of a sovereign use in society and the women didnt work much and did more of the housework.This could mean that the male characters in plays around this time were more dwarf and women did more housework and just bid Meg, fussed around their husband as he was the only source of income, this could influence Meg as creation fussy and concerning over Petey. The war would have been less th an two decades past so that may influence the characters in plays. Meg maybe fussing around he husband because he was a war-hero influencing her to very proud and feel for of husband, or maybe Petey only has a morning job because he is slightly injured, this could influence his physical expression.This is different from the text that we have canvas called Abigails Party because was set in the 1970s where women had a more dominant role than in the 1950s. The women were more out-spoken and more free to work have more social activities. In Abigails Party there was a lot more conflict and more fiery fulfil between characters un resembling in the Birthday Party it was Meg say a definition, which Petey may of thought was stupid, Petey just answered simply in a slow pace and showed no motivation to want to speak.In Abigails Party when a comment was made that bingle of the partners didnt like to hear they either fought about it or gave a sarcastic comment to show their annoyance whe reas in the Birthday Party I, Petey, just gave gip simple unmotivated answers to a persistent and fussing Meg. The two plays showed different ship canal of coping with situations as throughout the scene we performed Petey showed boredom and Meg carried on being quirky, fussy and questionable, in comparison to that in Abigails Party they handled situations in a more sarcastic, and bloodative.The two plays are humorous on different levels. The Birthday Party is funny because of we can see Peteys work boredom of having this conversation and routine, which we can herald is a daily social occasion he goes through. Megs stupid comments just to speak and engage with Petey and in cases, to love out side life, is funny to us because the questions are stupid like when hes just got the corn flakes and she asks if they are nice and he hasnt even tasted them. However, the two plays have similarities. Pinter and Leigh are both cognize for subjectiveism.The scene on Birthday Party I perfor med was very natural and realistic nothing out of the ordinary happened it was very simple and barren but it was easy to relate to which made it effective and the birthday companionship as too naturalistic and perhaps more modern and in the effect of couple arguing and women playing more dominate roles. However, the Birthday Party as it goes on turns out to be more funny and super-natural. Both plays also have fussy and inquisitive women. Meg is very questionable to Petey and wanting(p) to know things, Bev.Tries to keep the gathering shes got hot and wanting people to pay attention to her likewise to Meg wanting Peteys attention. The historical and social setting is fairly similar as the man in Birthday Party does seem to have the dominant role as Meg does everything for him cooking, washing etc. Contrastingly to when Angie says something against Tony, like he is argumentative or wont do something, he takes action by shouting or grabbing her hand. Angie stops and doesnt protest showing men still had some dominant role in the 70s.We are presenting our play as the audience in a semi-circle in one end of the studio and us do in the other half of the circle. This allows the audience to be the third wall, which is very in the style of Pinter and Leigh. This can give the audience more of a role and part, its very soap like, which is naturalistic, just as the plays studied, are intend to be. We are using different techniques and styles of performing such as large-minded each character more or less just one characteristic and not changing the pace much.For example when I play Petey I unplowed the same tone and tired motivation to tell the audience that Ive been doing this for a very long time. For Meg she kept her fussing and questionable ways and when Stanley comes down he was more mellow and got the military capability of Ive got my wrapped round my little finger. We used symbolism in our play, for example my paper. When I played Petey, the paper was my only bit of something untested for that day, everything else was the same predictable self but my paper, which Im though out the scene reading or holding, gives me salivation from Meg and the predictable ways.We are keeping the style very naturalistic. This is different from the other play as the characters pace compoundd very much through the play. At one time they would be talking and the next minute there would be an argument to change the pace and the mood in which all the characters felt up. You never felt the characters would stay for long at one place whereas Petey stayed in the conduce all the time and kept his pace the same except it did change sometimes. The other text (Abigails party) influenced our performance by making Meg a little more dominate and persistent for Peteys attention.